The Emerson Avenger

The Emerson Avenger is a "memory hole" free blog where censorship is scorned. This blog will "guard the right to know" about any injustices and abuses that corrupt Unitarian Universalism. Posters may speak and argue freely, according to conscience, about any injustices and abuses, or indeed hypocrisy, that they may know about so that the Avenger, in the form of justice and redress, may come surely and swiftly. . . "Slowly, slowly the Avenger comes, but comes surely." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

My Photo
Name:
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

In 1992 I underwent a profound revelatory experience of God which revealed that the total solar eclipse "Eye of God" is a "Sign in the Heavens" that symbolizes God's divine omniscience. You may read about what Rev. Ray Drennan of the Unitarian Church of Montreal contemptuously dismissed as my "psychotic experience" here: http://revelationisnotsealed.homestead.com - This revelatory religious experience inspired me to propose an inter-religious celebration of Creation that would take place whenever a total solar eclipse took place over our planet. You may read about what Rev. Ray Drennan and other leading members of the Unitarian Church of Montreal falsely and maliciously labeled as a "cult" here: http://creationday.homestead.com - I am now an excommunicated Unitarian whose "alternative spiritual practice" includes publicly exposing and denouncing Unitarian*Universalist injustices, abuses, and hypocrisy. The Emerson Avenger blog will serve that purpose for me and hopefully others will share their concerns here. Dee Miller's term DIM Thinking is used frequently and appropriately on this blog. You may read more about what DIM Thinking is here - http://www.takecourage.org/defining.htm

Monday, April 21, 2008

Is Rev. Peter Morales' Campaign Slogan Realistic?



As may be seen in the above graphic from his Peter Morales For UUA President website, Rev. Peter Morales' UUA Presidential election campaign slogan is "We can be the religion of our time."

However, for the time being. . . according to Rev. Peter Morales' YouTube video of his speech officially announcing his candidacy for President of the UUA, Unitarian*Universalism is but a "microscopic" "tiny declining fringe religion" of our time.

Rev. Peter Morales YouTube Video Announcement



Rev. Peter Morales has posted this video of his speech announcing his candidacy for President of the UUA. I recommend that U*Us take the time to view it a pay heed to what Rev. Peter Morales has to say about the current condition of the Unitarian*Universalist religious community aka the U*U World aka "a tiny declining fringe religion."

Here is the comment that I just added to this U*U Tube video. I expect to add some more comments to it later unless Rev. Peter Morales engages in censorship and blocks or deletes my comments. I will also be sending a video response to it. I find it rather unfortunate, and more than a little bit ironic that, after acknowledging that he messes up all the time, Rev. Peter Morales messes up by describing other religions as "obsolete religions" in this announcement speech. . .


So Peter what do you intend to do to address the hatred, injustice, prejudice, ignorance and fear that pervades the U*U World? When will you and other U*Us provide genuine justice, equity and compassion to victims of U*U injustices, abuses and hypocrisy? How much openness and acceptance of God believing people can there be in the U*U World when intolerant fundamentalist atheist "Humanist" U*Us, including U*U clergy, are allowed to insult and abuse God believing people with complete impunity?


Update: The above question was very much in response to the following excerpt from Rev. Peter Morales' sermon titled 'A Religion for Our Time', delivered at Jefferson Unitarian Church in Golden Colorada on January 13, 2008, in which he announced his candidacy for next President of the UUA


We are not called to be a tiny, declining, fringe religion. We are called to feed the spiritually hungry and open our home to the religiously homeless. We are called to heal and empower people so that they can in turn help transform our world. We are called to teach our children compassion, understanding and respect—not indoctrinate them with fear and prejudice. We live in dark times, times filled with hatred, injustice, prejudice, ignorance. Sadly, obsolete religions created for another time contribute to the darkness.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, April 08, 2008

The Reality Of "Anything Goes" Unitarian*Universalism. . .

I submitted a response to Stephen Merino's "anything goes" blog post on his Reason and Reverence blog but, like a certain number of other U*U bloggers, he refuses to post my critical comments that point out problems with the U*U religious community. Unfortunately I failed to archive my response so I cannot repost it here. I will none-the-less repeat the valid points I made here so that others may read them and give them some thought. I will quote and respond to Stephen Merino's blog post point-by-point. This TEA blog post was originally a submitted as a comment on the excellent the Chalicefire blog of the Pullman Memorial Universalist Church in Albion, NY whose administrators have been very good about not censoring and suppressing my critical comments on some of their blog posts and even seem to genuinely appreciate my criticism and dissent. If only more U*Us could be as open to criticism and dissent as the good Unitarian*Universalist folk who host the Chalicefire blog.

:The more I think about the "anything goes" myth the more disturbed I get. I think it should bother UUs that this idea exists.

That may be so but this idea exists precisely because U*Us very often give the impression that "anything goes" in U*Uism through their words and actions. This includes U*U tracts and marketing materials to some degree.

:I think the "anything goes" idea becomes ridiculous if you understand the seven principles of UUism and the ideal of living ethically, responsibly, lovingly, and actively engaged in bettering the world.

Unfortunately there is a significant gap between what U*U principles and ideals claim and how many U*Us, including U*U clergy, actually behave.

:I did mention to my friend that I wouldn't be surprised to hear a minister or conservative Christian repeat that idea, since it would be in their interest to disparage other belief systems that don't agree with theirs.

It might interest U*Us to know that oh so liberal U*U ministers quite regularly, and at times very publicly, disparage other belief systems that don't agree with theirs. . .

:But it's not just religious conservatives that would repeat the "anything goes" myth. In their popular and widely-read book Acts of Faith, two leading sociologists of religion place Unitarian Universalism in the "ultra-liberal" niche.

The Oregonian newspaper placed Unitarian*Universalism in the "Church of the Far Left" niche in an article about last year's UUA GA in Portland Oregon. U*Us might want to give some thought as to why U*Uism is being placed in such niches by non-U*Us. Are U*Us aware that Rev. Peter Morales who, along with Rev. Laurel Hallman, is a candidate for the next President of the UUA, placed Unitarian*Universalism in the "tiny fringe religion" niche on his elect Peter Morales for UUA President web site?

:Faiths in this niche exist in very little tension with the surrounding society and ask little to nothing of their adherents.

Unfortunately U*Us often give the impression that they ask little to nothing of their adherents other than increasingly large donations of course. It seems that a certain number of U*U ministers are now asking U*Us to double their contributions to the church and start tithing. . . Whether this is an official UUA initiative has not yet been determined. OTOH I am not so sure about U*Us existing in very little tension with the surrounding society. I see a fair bit of evidence which suggests that, at least in some parts of the U*U World, U*Us are in more tension with the surrounding contemporary society than they might care to acknowledge.

:Tension or strictness has been shown to be strongly related to denominational growth and vitality, so this has obvious consequences for liberal and mainline churches, which generally have not done well over the last century (and even longer).

Well, as UUA Presidential hopeful Rev. Peter Morales says, U*Uism is a "tiny fringe religion". The membership statistics of Unitarian*Universalist Association of Congregations have remained pretty much stagnant since the UUA was formed in 1961. U*Us need to ask why so few people care to be U*Us.

:I think that on the liberal end of the religious spectrum, tension with society increases again.

Indeed it does, especially when society gets the impression that "anything goes". . .

:What about its openness and acceptance of atheists and agnostics?

What about its acceptance of intolerant and abusive anti-religious atheists amongst its ranks, and even amongst its clergy? I have often said that this makes many U*U Welcoming Congregations anything but welcoming to God believing people who comprise the vast majority of Americans. . . If the U*U faith chooses to accept anti-religious fundamentalist atheist bigots as church members, and even as ordained U*U ministers, it is not surprising that U*UIsm will not be the chosen faith of many God believing people who might otherwise have chosen to become U*Us.

:There is one sense in which the "anything goes" idea is right. There is no one checking up on you at church. You can do all sorts of awful things and still comfortably sit in a pew on Sunday morning.

U*U ministers can do all sorts of awful things and still comfortably preach from the pulpit on Sunday morning. . .

:But in my experience, this does not make UUs less insistent upon living moral, decent lives. And it's just flat out wrong that anything goes in a UU church.

Wrong. There are any number of examples that illustrate that all sorts of awful things are tolerated and accepted by U*Us and U*U churches.

:It's not OK to hate, to belittle, to exclude those with whom you disagree, or to discriminate based on race, gender, age, or sexual orientation.

Actually, through their well-documented words and actions, U*Us have repeatedly demonstrated that it is OK for U*Us to hate, to belittle, and to exclude those with whom U*Us disagree. Quite ironically Stephen Merino, and various other U*U bloggers, seem to think that it is perfectly OK to exclude those with whom they disagree.

:We can't control what other people think.

Actually U*Us have a high degree of control over what other people think about U*Us and U*Uism. It all comes down to how U*Us strive to honourably practice what they preach, or abjectly fail and even obstinately refuse to do so. . .

:But let's not give them any reason believe the "anything goes" myth.

Unfortunately U*Us quite regularly give people reason to believe that "anything goes" in the U*U religious community. Here is just one small but well documented example of that quite regrettable fact. Sadly there are numerous other examples of such anything goes bad faith displayed by U*U clergy and UUA officials to say nothing of the ordinary lay people of the U*U religious community.

Are Rev. Diane Rollert's Pants On Fire?

Just asking. . .

Of course it doesn't hurt to ask again either.

Labels: , , , ,

Sunday, April 06, 2008

What's Wrong With Rev. Diane Rollert?

As I was engaging in my "alternative spiritual practice" of protesting against U*U anti-religious intolerance and bigotry and other U*U injustices, abuses and hypocrisy in front of the Unitarian Church of Montreal this morning, a woman approaching this alleged Unitarian Church stopped and asked me, "What's wrong with the new minister?" I answered her question by telling her about one particular thing that Rev. Diane Rollert has done that most people of intelligence and conscience will agree is wrong. In fact this woman seemed somewhat shocked by how I bluntly responded to her question about Rev. Diane Rollert with three words. Inspite of seeming to be somewhat shocked and surprised by what I said this woman seemed to be quite open to the possibility that what I told her in rather bluntly answering her question was true. I made it clear to her that what I had said about Rev. Rollert was "provable" and then told her that there were plenty of other things wrong with Rev. Diane Rollert. I guess this is yet another Unitarian*Universalist incident that validates my bon mot -

"Be careful what U*Us ask for, lest U*Us get it. . ."

Of course the thinly veiled subtext of this woman's question about the "new minister" was that, if there was nothing wrong with the Unitarian Church of Montreal's now not so brand-spanking new minister, I should not be continuing my protest in front of her so-called Unitarian Church. This woman, and no shortage of DIM Thinking Montreal Unitarians, don't seem to understand that I am protesting against the injustices, abuses and hypocrisy of the Unitarian Church of Montreal as an institution and congregation as well as various other U*U injustices, abuses and hypocrisy found in the greater U*U World. Only a minority of my picket sign slogans have ever directly targeted the minister of the Unitarian Church of Montreal. From the very beginning of my public protest in May of 1998 my picket signs have protested against the unjust, inequitable and far from compassionate actions of the Unitarian Church of Montreal as an institution as well as more widespread U*U injustices, abuses and hypocrisy, including those of the UUA and its negligent and effectively complicit Ministerial Fellowship Committee. Even if Rev. Diane Rollert had done nothing wrong since becoming the not so new, and not so settled. . . minister of the Unitarian Church of Montreal that would not be a reason to end my protest, especially since I explicitly warned the Board of the Unitarian Church of Montreal that my public protest would continue into the term of the new minister if they failed to subject Rev. Ray Drennan to appropriate disciplinary action for his intolerant and abusive clergy misconduct prior to this U*U rat abandoning his sinking U*U Ship of Fools. . .

Although I have in the past written a few chalk slogans on the sidewalk in front of the Unitarian Church of Montreal that directly target the failings of Rev. Diane Rollert I have yet to create any picket signs that protest against some of the things that are wrong with her, or the wrongs that she has committed. I will be getting around to that soon enough however, especially since Rev. Diane Rollert has now given me plenty of material to use to criticize her personally and publicly expose her own quite outrageous hypocrisy. Montreal Unitarians, other Unitarian*Universalists, and plenty of non-U*Us will know soon enough just what is wrong with Rev. Diane Rollert. If anyone is curious about how I responded to the question, "What is wrong with the new minister?" my immediate blunt response was, "She committed perjury." I then told this women that Rev. Diane Rollert had told at least three or four lies in her sworn testimony as a prosecution witness in criminal court and that some of her lies were provable. . .

I might add that, in addition to the outright lies that Rev. Diane Rollert told while under oath, she told a fair number of other falsehoods during her sworn testimony in court which may not be actual lies in that she may have believed them to be true. I did warn Rev. Rollert in my initial email communication to her that the Board of the Unitarian Church of Montreal would probably feed her a fair bit of misinformation and disinformation about me and this conflict but her chosen fate was to foolishly ignore those warnings and swallow the misleading half-truths and whole lies that the UCM's Board fed to her hook, line and sinker. . . That being said, the outright lies that Rev. Diane Rollert told to a judge in criminal court while under a solemn oath to tell the truth are her own doing and her own personal responsibility. I will be holding Rev. Rollert personally responsible for her perjurious lies to the extent that I am able to do so.

Labels: , , , , ,