Are You Feeling Lucky U*Us? Go Ahead. Make My Day. . .
A couple of U*U bloggers sure picked a bad day to post a load of hypocritical U*U BS to their respective blogs. . .
I first came across the Socinian's blog post God Is Still Speaking in which "Fausto" (who no doubt jokingly suggests that he just might be the Anti-Christ in his blogger profile. . .) pretends that the slogan "God Is Still Speaking" "resonates" with U*Us. I responded by pointing out just how empty his rhetoric was, and it didn't take long for "Fausto" to start censoring my posts even though they were 100% on topic to his thread.
I then discovered that U*U hypocrite extraordinaire "Ms. Theologian" had posted the following to her blog -
Friday, July 13, 2007
Bigots in the Senate
When Jim and I saw this last night on the news, we couldn't quite believe what we were seeing: bigots yelling at a Hindu because they felt he shouldn't say a prayer in front of the Senate.
It's worth saying that Diana Eck of the Pluralism Project believes the United States is the most religiously diverse country on earth. Apart from the fact that I'm not particularly into prayers said outloud in workplaces, I think it's pretty awful that some people feel a non-Christian prayer needs to be shouted down. Pluralism seems to make Evangelical Christians extremely uncomfortable.
end quote
That's funny Ms. Theologian, so why is it that you apparently do not feel awful when bigots in the Unitarian*Universalist "religious community" not only "yell" at a Unitarian "church" member because they feel that he shouldn't hold an inter-religious celebration of Creation in their alleged "church"?
Why is it Ms. Theologian, that you and no shortage of other "like-minded" Unitarian*Universalist U*Us, apparently do not think that it's "pretty awful" that some U*Us feel that a very pluralistic inter-religious celebration of Creation not only needs to be "shouted down" but outright banned from being celebrated in an alleged Unitarian "church"?
Why is it Ms. Theologian, that you and no shortage of other "like-minded" Unitarian*Universalist U*Us, apparently do not think that it's "pretty awful" that some U*Us feel that a claimed revelation of God of considerable significance needs to be "shouted down" by Evangelical fundamentalist atheist "Unitarians"?
Pluralism, to say nothing of revelation. . . seems to make U*Us (and not just those evangelical fundamentalist atheist "Unitarians". . .) extremely uncomfortable doesn't it Ms. Theologian?
I cannot post this comment on Ms. Theologian's hypocritical post because she banned me from commenting on her blog a while back, but I can't help but take note of the following comment that she did see fit to allow to appear on her U*U blog -
I saw that headline. Couldn't read it. Can't watch the video either. Because next thing you'd see me on the news being arrested, with the headline "Terror in the Senate Building."
GhostGirl | Homepage | 07.13.07 - 3:33 pm | #
end quote
I wonder if Ms. Theologian will bother to notify the FBI and/or the Secret Service and/or the Department of Homeland Security about that comment which would seem to indicate that maybe just maybe GhostGirl might possibly commit a "personal serious injury offence" to some US senators? It would certainly appear that Ms. Theologian has far more "reasonable grounds" to believe that GhostGirl just might commit a "personal serious injury offence" against US senators than Montreal Unitarian hypocrite extraordinaire Rev. Diane Rollert has to believe that I might commit a "personal serious injury offence" against her or other Montreal Unitarian U*Us. . .
I first came across the Socinian's blog post God Is Still Speaking in which "Fausto" (who no doubt jokingly suggests that he just might be the Anti-Christ in his blogger profile. . .) pretends that the slogan "God Is Still Speaking" "resonates" with U*Us. I responded by pointing out just how empty his rhetoric was, and it didn't take long for "Fausto" to start censoring my posts even though they were 100% on topic to his thread.
I then discovered that U*U hypocrite extraordinaire "Ms. Theologian" had posted the following to her blog -
Friday, July 13, 2007
Bigots in the Senate
When Jim and I saw this last night on the news, we couldn't quite believe what we were seeing: bigots yelling at a Hindu because they felt he shouldn't say a prayer in front of the Senate.
It's worth saying that Diana Eck of the Pluralism Project believes the United States is the most religiously diverse country on earth. Apart from the fact that I'm not particularly into prayers said outloud in workplaces, I think it's pretty awful that some people feel a non-Christian prayer needs to be shouted down. Pluralism seems to make Evangelical Christians extremely uncomfortable.
end quote
That's funny Ms. Theologian, so why is it that you apparently do not feel awful when bigots in the Unitarian*Universalist "religious community" not only "yell" at a Unitarian "church" member because they feel that he shouldn't hold an inter-religious celebration of Creation in their alleged "church"?
Why is it Ms. Theologian, that you and no shortage of other "like-minded" Unitarian*Universalist U*Us, apparently do not think that it's "pretty awful" that some U*Us feel that a very pluralistic inter-religious celebration of Creation not only needs to be "shouted down" but outright banned from being celebrated in an alleged Unitarian "church"?
Why is it Ms. Theologian, that you and no shortage of other "like-minded" Unitarian*Universalist U*Us, apparently do not think that it's "pretty awful" that some U*Us feel that a claimed revelation of God of considerable significance needs to be "shouted down" by Evangelical fundamentalist atheist "Unitarians"?
Pluralism, to say nothing of revelation. . . seems to make U*Us (and not just those evangelical fundamentalist atheist "Unitarians". . .) extremely uncomfortable doesn't it Ms. Theologian?
I cannot post this comment on Ms. Theologian's hypocritical post because she banned me from commenting on her blog a while back, but I can't help but take note of the following comment that she did see fit to allow to appear on her U*U blog -
I saw that headline. Couldn't read it. Can't watch the video either. Because next thing you'd see me on the news being arrested, with the headline "Terror in the Senate Building."
GhostGirl | Homepage | 07.13.07 - 3:33 pm | #
end quote
I wonder if Ms. Theologian will bother to notify the FBI and/or the Secret Service and/or the Department of Homeland Security about that comment which would seem to indicate that maybe just maybe GhostGirl might possibly commit a "personal serious injury offence" to some US senators? It would certainly appear that Ms. Theologian has far more "reasonable grounds" to believe that GhostGirl just might commit a "personal serious injury offence" against US senators than Montreal Unitarian hypocrite extraordinaire Rev. Diane Rollert has to believe that I might commit a "personal serious injury offence" against her or other Montreal Unitarian U*Us. . .
Comments