Do Unitarian Universalists Hold Such Despicable Crimes As Pedophilia And Rape To Be Sacred And*Or Holy To Unitarian*Universalism aka The U*U Movement?
BCC God knows. . .
Without Prejudice
TEA Time Freya's Day October 16, 2015
Dear Maitre Coulombe,
It
is now 3 years, 4 months and 15 days since you hit 'Send' on the
"electronic communication" aka email which informed me that, amongst
other highly questionable and indeed rather laughable accusations, you
(and by extension Stikeman Elliott Barristers & Solicitors LLP as a
law firm) are accusing me of the archaic criminal act of blasphemous libel for allegedly making "unfounded and vicious allegations to the
effect that ministers of the Association engage in such despicable
crimes as pedophilia and rape" on behalf of your "less than honest" client the Unitarian Universalist Association.
In spite of my repeated requests that you properly identify exactly
which The Emerson Avenger blog posts you and your U*U client(s) allege
to contain "unfounded
and
vicious allegations" about "certain Unitarian Universalist ministers"
engaging in "such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape", to date,
you have not identified one single blog post that allegedly or actually
amounts to the criminal act of blasphemous libel. Yet, both you and your
U*U client(s) obstinately refuse to formally withdraw this and other
dubious accusations you brought against me, and properly and publicly
apologize for bringing them against me.
I have made it VERY clear to you and your U*U client(s) that until such a time as you personally, Stikeman Elliott Barristers & Solicitors as a law firm, the Unitarian Universalist Association as a "religious institution", and the two female U*U ministers who you do not name in your ludicrous cease and desist demand letter formally withdraw your highly misleading and*or outright false accusations against me I will reasonably assume that you are ALL "standing on the side of love" for your laughable accusations against me and will be governing myself accordingly. I thus have to ask myself (and you and your clients) how it is possible that almost three and a half years after accusing me of the archaic crime of blasphemous libel you insist on standing on the side of love for that extremely dubious accusation. Having researched Canada's blasphemy law I have long ago come to the conclusion that there is only one possible circumstance under which I could be possibly be found guilty of the crime of blasphemous libel against the Unitarian Universalist "church" for posting The Emerson Avenger blog posts that speak in derogation of Unitarian Universalist pedophiles and rapists, regardless of whether or not those blog posts contain allegations that are "unfounded and vicious" or not.
I have made it VERY clear to you and your U*U client(s) that until such a time as you personally, Stikeman Elliott Barristers & Solicitors as a law firm, the Unitarian Universalist Association as a "religious institution", and the two female U*U ministers who you do not name in your ludicrous cease and desist demand letter formally withdraw your highly misleading and*or outright false accusations against me I will reasonably assume that you are ALL "standing on the side of love" for your laughable accusations against me and will be governing myself accordingly. I thus have to ask myself (and you and your clients) how it is possible that almost three and a half years after accusing me of the archaic crime of blasphemous libel you insist on standing on the side of love for that extremely dubious accusation. Having researched Canada's blasphemy law I have long ago come to the conclusion that there is only one possible circumstance under which I could be possibly be found guilty of the crime of blasphemous libel against the Unitarian Universalist "church" for posting The Emerson Avenger blog posts that speak in derogation of Unitarian Universalist pedophiles and rapists, regardless of whether or not those blog posts contain allegations that are "unfounded and vicious" or not.
I dare say that, while my blog posts about U*U pedophiles and rapists who have in fact been convicted of "such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape" may well insult the feelings and the deepest religious convictions of the great majority of your immoral and unethical U*U clients, to say nothing of the great majority of members in The U*U Movement more generally, I have NO reason whatsoever to believe that ANY Québec Crown Prosecutor could convince ANY competent Québec court judge (or jury) that my very well founded, and not particularly vicious, blog posts about U*U pedophiles and rapists are "calculated and intended to insult the feelings and the deepest religious convictions of the great majority of the persons amongst whom we live" in the province of Québec, the nation of Canada, and the continent known as North America. Never-the-less aka notwithstanding, I feel obliged to ask you the following Big Fat U*U Question -
Is the Big Fat U*U Motivation for you and your immoral and unethical, to say nothing of #BatShitCrazy, U*U clients to SO obstinately refuse to formally withdraw your highly questionable, indeed outright false and utterly shameful, blasphemous libel accusation against me, and to properly and publicly apologize for bringing that false accusation against me, because your U*U clients and*or other U*Us actually DO hold "such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape" to be sacred and*or holy to The U*U Movement aka Unitarian*Universalism, at least when "such despicable crimes" are committed by "certain Unitarian*Universalist ministers" such as the Reverend Mack Wallace Mitchell, to name but one of the U*U ministers who have been convicted of engaging in "such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape"?
Just asking.
Allah prochaine chicane *,
Robin Edgar aka The Emerson Avenger
* Kurt Vonnegut Jr.'s "picture of an asshole".
Comments