Montreal Gazette Ending Facebook Commenting And Montreal Unitarian U*U Sue Montgomery's Complicity In Unitarian Universalist Clergy Abuse Cover-Up Efforts - What

Maybe it's just a coincidence, but the Montreal Gazette stopped using Facebook for comments on its online articles a few days ago, and initiated a new "moderated" aka censored commenting function, soon after Rich James posted the following comments in response to Montreal Gazette "crime reporter", and former professional colleague of "retired" Montreal Gazette "Justice Reporter" Sue Montgomery, Paul Cherry's biased and misleading "journalism" about my trial for alleged criminal harassment of Sue Montgomery headlined:

C.D.N.-N.D.G. mayor calls alleged harassment a distraction from work

Rich James

Prosecutor kept asking her the standard open questions: what happened on such and such a date and no memory... at one point she asked permission to ask a more directive question. This is probably a reason why defence counsel is considering not making a defence. The witness was just not very good. Moreover, if this is, in fact, "psychological harassment", that is not enough, more than this is required for guilt under s. 264 Criminal Code.

Rich James

Mr Edgar was outside of a major metro station when the encounter so described took place:

"She also said she finally decided to file a complaint with the police after, following the election, she spotted Edgar standing on the same street where she lives."

He was standing on De Maisonneuve and Marlowe directly across from the Vendome metro, one of the busiest in town. It turns out that Montgomery lives on Marlowe. The most plausible explanation for his presence there was that he used the metro, and not that he was there to bother Ms Montgomery.

I am not sure why Rich James' first comment gets cut off in the above copy and paste from the Facebook commenting area. Here is the rest of it:

Moreover, if this is, in fact, "psychological harassment", that is not enough, more than this is required for guilt under s. 264 Criminal Code.

The Gazette switching from using Facebook for commenting on its articles had the effect of "memory holing" these very pertinent comments by Rich James, not to mention previous comments by Rich James and other people on older articles, effectively relegates them to the Orwellian "memory hole" of deleted online information. I am thus reposting Rich James's comments here so that they remain available to the judge and jury of the proverbial "court of public opinion". Here are before and after screenshots of The Gazette's commenting section on this biased, and deliberately misleading, Gazette article by Sue Montgomery's former "journalism" colleague, and apparent personal friend. . . Gazette "Crime Reporter" Paul Cherry:

This is a short video clip that I shot minutes after the unexpected chance encounter that I had with Montreal Unitarian clergy abuse cover-up enabler Sue Montgomery on the morning of December 5th, 2017. I "filmed" the video clip because I considered that unexpected encounter to be an unusual "meaningful coincidence" aka synchronicity, not being aware that Sue Montgomery lived on Marlowe street at the time. I also wanted to have a record of what I said to her during the encounter and to make that information available to the public.