Stikeman Elliott LLP Barristers & Solicitors And The Robin Edgar Sucks Blog. . . What's The Connection?
*Someone* from the Montréal office of Stikeman Elliott LLP Barristers & Solicitors paid a visit to The Emerson Avenger blog yesterday, and they arrived here as a result of running a free and responsible Google search for -
robin edgar uu
So what exactly is the Big Fat U*U Connection between the law firm Stikeman Elliott Barristers LLP & Solicitors and the slanderous and libelous Robin Edgar Sucks blog U*Us ask?
Well, Truth be told, there a number of connections, most of which predate yesterday's visit by *someone* from Stikeman Elliott, *someone* who was most likely to be one Marc-André Coulombe who chose the Big Fat U*U Fate of sending me one of the funniest cease and desist demand letters in the history of the U*U World on June 1st of this year. With respect to yesterday's visit from *someone* at Stikeman Elliott however, I could not help but notice that the Number One result for the aforementioned Google search is the homepage of the Robin Edgar Sucks blog, and that the second Google result is a Robin Edgar Sucks blog post entitled 'How Robin Edgar Defamed the UUA' which was posted to the ever so interconnected and interdependent web of the internet on March 7, 2011.
Quite ironically, that Robin Edgar Sucks blog post alleges that I have "repeatedly alleged that the UUA and its Ministerial Fellowship Committee engaged in a ‘cover-up’ regarding sexual assault charges against Reverend Mack Mitchell in 1991." In fact I have done no such thing but, as an anonymous comment points out, I have quite justifiably "accused one UU lay leader of trying to cover up Mitchell’s misconduct", indeed I have also previously accused Rev. Victoria Weinstein aka Peacebang of "memory holing" my comments about Rev. Mack Mitchell's egregious clergy sexual misconduct which included but was not limited to the rape of vulnerable teenage Tibetan refugees who he had lured to his UU parish in Northboro MA with promises of "a better life in America". This of course brings us full circle to one of the most highly questionable accusations brought against me by Maitre Marc-André Coulombe on behalf of his client the Unitarian Universalist Association. Specifically the less than well founded accusation to the effect that I have made "unfounded and vicious allegations to the effect that ministers of the (Unitarian Universalist) Association engage in such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape."
Most ironically. . . I never actually accused the Unitarian Universalist Association itself of trying to cover-up and hide the fact that the "less than perfect" Unitarian Universalist minister Rev. Mack Mitchell had raped vulnerable teenage Tibetan refugees after luring them away from their family in India to his parish in Northborough MA. I *had* accused Rev. Victoria Weinstein aka Peacebang of "memory holing" my comments regarding Rev. Mack Mitchell's egregious clergy sexual misconduct that I had posted in response to her blog post entitled 'Violating the Privacy of the Mind And the Body' and I had likewise accused U*U BDSM Dom Desmond Ravenstone of similar "memory holing" of one or more comments mentioning Rev. Mack Mitchell's "bondage and domination" of Tibetan refugees that I had posted in response to one of his 'Ravenstone's Reflections' blog posts, but I had not accused the UUA itself of cover-up. Interestingly enough, in subsequent comparatively recent research into the Rev. Mack Mitchell case involving reading contemporary newspaper reports that are not available online, I have learned that the UUA did in fact want to handle this matter "in confidence" but the possibility of a private and confidential settlement was negated when one of Rev. Mack Mitchell's female parishioner's decided to share her concerns about Mack Mitchell's sexual proclivities with the police. Once the matter was in the hands of the police and justice system the UUA no longer in a position to keep the matter confidential was it?
So what I find quite interesting is that, years and years and years later, the Unitarian Universalist Association is now quite cynically attempting to force me to "memory hole" The Emerson Avenger blog posts about Rev. Mack Mitchell and another U*U criminal who was convicted of raping preteen girls, including "a female family member", by falsely accusing me of the archaic crime of blasphemous libel on the unfounded basis that I have made "unfounded and vicious allegations to the effect that ministers of the (Unitarian Universalist) Association engage in such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape." So *that* U*Us is one of the ways, albeit not the only way. . . that the UUA's Canadian attorneys Stikeman Elliott LLP Barristers & Solicitors are interconnected with the Robin Edgar Sucks blog on the the interdependent web of the internet, which of course is part of the interconnected and interdependent web of all existence.
The hubris.
The Big Fat U*U Hubris. . .
So what exactly is the Big Fat U*U Connection between the law firm Stikeman Elliott Barristers LLP & Solicitors and the slanderous and libelous Robin Edgar Sucks blog U*Us ask?
Well, Truth be told, there a number of connections, most of which predate yesterday's visit by *someone* from Stikeman Elliott, *someone* who was most likely to be one Marc-André Coulombe who chose the Big Fat U*U Fate of sending me one of the funniest cease and desist demand letters in the history of the U*U World on June 1st of this year. With respect to yesterday's visit from *someone* at Stikeman Elliott however, I could not help but notice that the Number One result for the aforementioned Google search is the homepage of the Robin Edgar Sucks blog, and that the second Google result is a Robin Edgar Sucks blog post entitled 'How Robin Edgar Defamed the UUA' which was posted to the ever so interconnected and interdependent web of the internet on March 7, 2011.
Quite ironically, that Robin Edgar Sucks blog post alleges that I have "repeatedly alleged that the UUA and its Ministerial Fellowship Committee engaged in a ‘cover-up’ regarding sexual assault charges against Reverend Mack Mitchell in 1991." In fact I have done no such thing but, as an anonymous comment points out, I have quite justifiably "accused one UU lay leader of trying to cover up Mitchell’s misconduct", indeed I have also previously accused Rev. Victoria Weinstein aka Peacebang of "memory holing" my comments about Rev. Mack Mitchell's egregious clergy sexual misconduct which included but was not limited to the rape of vulnerable teenage Tibetan refugees who he had lured to his UU parish in Northboro MA with promises of "a better life in America". This of course brings us full circle to one of the most highly questionable accusations brought against me by Maitre Marc-André Coulombe on behalf of his client the Unitarian Universalist Association. Specifically the less than well founded accusation to the effect that I have made "unfounded and vicious allegations to the effect that ministers of the (Unitarian Universalist) Association engage in such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape."
Most ironically. . . I never actually accused the Unitarian Universalist Association itself of trying to cover-up and hide the fact that the "less than perfect" Unitarian Universalist minister Rev. Mack Mitchell had raped vulnerable teenage Tibetan refugees after luring them away from their family in India to his parish in Northborough MA. I *had* accused Rev. Victoria Weinstein aka Peacebang of "memory holing" my comments regarding Rev. Mack Mitchell's egregious clergy sexual misconduct that I had posted in response to her blog post entitled 'Violating the Privacy of the Mind And the Body' and I had likewise accused U*U BDSM Dom Desmond Ravenstone of similar "memory holing" of one or more comments mentioning Rev. Mack Mitchell's "bondage and domination" of Tibetan refugees that I had posted in response to one of his 'Ravenstone's Reflections' blog posts, but I had not accused the UUA itself of cover-up. Interestingly enough, in subsequent comparatively recent research into the Rev. Mack Mitchell case involving reading contemporary newspaper reports that are not available online, I have learned that the UUA did in fact want to handle this matter "in confidence" but the possibility of a private and confidential settlement was negated when one of Rev. Mack Mitchell's female parishioner's decided to share her concerns about Mack Mitchell's sexual proclivities with the police. Once the matter was in the hands of the police and justice system the UUA no longer in a position to keep the matter confidential was it?
So what I find quite interesting is that, years and years and years later, the Unitarian Universalist Association is now quite cynically attempting to force me to "memory hole" The Emerson Avenger blog posts about Rev. Mack Mitchell and another U*U criminal who was convicted of raping preteen girls, including "a female family member", by falsely accusing me of the archaic crime of blasphemous libel on the unfounded basis that I have made "unfounded and vicious allegations to the effect that ministers of the (Unitarian Universalist) Association engage in such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape." So *that* U*Us is one of the ways, albeit not the only way. . . that the UUA's Canadian attorneys Stikeman Elliott LLP Barristers & Solicitors are interconnected with the Robin Edgar Sucks blog on the the interdependent web of the internet, which of course is part of the interconnected and interdependent web of all existence.
The hubris.
The Big Fat U*U Hubris. . .
Comments