Stikeman Elliott Solicitor Marc-André Coulombe Receives Yet Another "Electronic Communication" Courtesy Of The Emerson Avenger. . .

I felt obliged to send self-described UUA attorney Maitre Marc-André Coulombe of Stikeman Elliott LLP Barristers & Solicitors yet another email aka "electronic communication" earlier today since he has consistently failed, or indeed quite obstinately refused. . . to so much as acknowledge receipt of the various emails that I have sent to him since has last letter to me dated June 5th 2012, let alone responded in genuine responsibility to the proverbial "Spirit that bloweth where it listeth" in those emails that I had sent to him. I had previously sent Maitre Coulombe an email last Thor's Day, i.e. November 15, 2012, reminding him of these emails that he had failed to respond to, but he failed to respond to that email too. So I sent him this reminder today.

I have included last week's email which today's email forwarded. The earlier emails referred to in last week's email were posted to my blog post titled -

Friday The 13th July 2012 Was A "Less Than Lucky" Day For Maitre Marc-André Coulombe Of Stikeman Elliott And The Unitarian Universalist Association

Fw: A Few More Questions Re: Unitarian Universalist Association and al. vs. Yourself

FROM: Robin Edgar

TO: macoulombe@stikeman.com

CC: president@uua.org, administration@uua.org, kmontgomery@uua.org

BCC: gcourter@uua.org, board@uua.org

Thursday, November 22, 2012 11:20:08 AM

Thursday aka Thor's Day November 22, 2012

Without Prejudice

Dear Maitre Coulombe,

It is now a full week since I sent you the email copied below, and well over five months since I sent you the emails that last week's email referenced and forwarded.

To date you have not so much as acknowledged receipt of these emails, let alone responsibly responded to the various requests and questions and other communications that they address to you and your client(s).

AFA*I*AC Your silence, to say nothing of that of your "less than honest" client the Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations, is far from golden. . .

Indeed I consider your silence, and that of your client, to be symptomatic of moral cowardice, if not plain old ordinary cowardice.

So what exactly are you and your "less than courageous" client afraid of Maitre Coulombe?

The capital 'T' objective Truth perhaps?

The Truth that Rev. Victoria Weinstein's Big Fat U*U "sodomy fantasy" which luridly, obscenely, and just a tad Sadistically. . . imagined Republican state senator William "Bill" Napoli "anally impaled on the Statue Of Liberty's torch" *could* be quite justifiably described as -

Threatening and defamatory conduct amounting to sexual harassment against Republican state senator William "Bill" Napoli?

Heck, in a bit of a legalistic stretch. . . the kind of "less than honest" stretch that you and your "less than honest" client seem to be only too happy to engage in yourselves, one might even go so far as to characterize Rev. Vicki Weinstein's "sodomy fantasy" as amounting to "death threats" against Senator Napoli in that, if one actually was able to anally impale a person of inherent worth and dignity on the Statue of Liberty's torch, doing so would almost certainly result in their agonizing and humiliating death. . .

Right Maitre Coulombe?

The Truth that those few The Emerson Avenger blog posts which actually do speak of Unitarian Universalists engaging in "such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape" are anything but "unfounded and vicious", as you have formally alleged on behalf of your "less than honest" client the Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations?

The readily verifiable objective Truth that the "less than perfect" Unitarian Universalist minister Rev. Mack W. Mitchell, the former "pastor" aka "wolf in shepherd's clothing" of the Unitarian Universalist "churches" in Westborough and Northborough Massachusetts, was charged, tried, and convicted of the forcible rape of one Phuntsok Meston, a vulnerable teenage Tibetan refugee whom he had lured away from her family in India with promises of a new and better life in America?

The readily verifiable objective Truth that the Reverend Doctor Victoria Weinstein's "less than perfect" parishioner Richard "Dick" Buell, of First Parish Norwell Unitarian Universalist "church", was charged, tried, and convicted of the forcible rape of preteen girls, including "a female family member", and was subsequently sentenced to serve at least 10 years in a Massachusetts state prison for his forcible rapes of prepubescent female children which, in light of their young age, quite evidently combined the despicable crimes of pedophilia with rape?

I *could* go on about some of the various other ways that your highly questionable cease and desist demand letter contains "less than honest", if not outright perjurious. . . accusations against me, but by now you really *should* have got the proverbial picture.

No Maitre Coulombe?

In my books, both you and your "less than honest" client are standing on the wrong side of capital 'T' objective and verifiable Truth. You are likewise standing on the wrong side of the "justice, equity and compassion in human relations" that Unitarian Universalists ostensibly "affirm and promote" in the Second Principle of Unitarian Universalism.

In fact, AFA*I*AC your "less than honest" cease and desist demand letter only serves to further validate my "less than new" picket sign slogans which say -

U*Us PERVERT JUSTICE

U*Us CENSOR & SUPPRESS CRITICS

and the BULLYING part of

UNITARIAN BULLYING & BIGOTRY SUCK U*U

as in legal bullying aka legal intimidation

And *that* kinda sucks, doesn't it Maitre Coulombe?

So please be so kind as to formally acknowledge receipt of today's email, as well as acknowledging receipt of ALL of my previous emails aka "electronic communications", and please DO let me know when you and your outrageously hypocritical client the Unitarian Universalist Association are ready to formally withdraw your "less than honest" accusations against me, accusations which include but are by no means limited to your ludicrous accusation(s) to the effect that The Emerson Avenger blog posts about some Unitarian Universalist rapists and pedophiles engaging in such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape are "unfounded and vicious", to say nothing of defamatory to an extent that they constitute the archaic, if not outright obsolete... crime of blasphemous libel which is prohibited under section 296 of the Canadian Criminal Code yadda, yadda, yadda. . .

I dare say that I have been ROTFLMU*UO! over *that* all but "beyond belief" accusation against me since you brought it to my attention in your email of June 1, 2012.

Last, but by no means least, please let me know when you, and your "less than honest" client the Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations, are ready to sincerely, comprehensively, and very publicly, formally apologize to me for dreaming up these foolish things which remind me of U*U perversion of justice past. . .

Allah prochaine,

Robin Edgar aka The Emerson Avenger



----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Robin Edgar
To: ""macoulombe@stikeman.com""
Cc: ""president@uua.org"" ; ""administration@uua.org"" ; ""kmontgomery@uua.org""
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2012 1:56:47 PM
Subject: Fw: A Few More Questions Re: Unitarian Universalist Association and al. vs. Yourself

Thursday aka Thor's Day November 15, 2012

Without Prejudice

Dear Maitre Coulombe,

It is now five months since I sent you the email copied immediately below dated Friday aka Freya's Day June 15, 2012. You and your client the Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations have continuously neglected or, more to the point, outright refused. . . to respond to my emails in any manner whatsoever. Neither you, nor the UUA, have provided any evidence whatsoever in support of the UUA's accusation to the effect that I am guilty of making "unfounded and vicious allegations to the effect that ministers of the Association engage in such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape." Likewise, you have failed or refused to provide requested evidence for some of the other questionable accusations that you brought against me in your cease and desist demand letter dated May 29, 2012 and your follow-up letter dated June 5, 2012.

You and your client have clearly disregarded my demand that you and the UUA must withdraw your false accusations against me, and officially, adequately, and publicly apologize to me for bringing such deeply insulting and, I believe, defamatory accusations against me without providing any evidence whatsoever in support of them.

As far as I am concerned your client's accusation to the effect that I have made "unfounded and vicious allegations to the effect that ministers of the Association engage in such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape" is not only a completely false accusation but, in that the Executive Vice President of the Unitarian Universalist Association and other top level UUA administrators are in a position to know perfectly well that the comparatively few allegations that I have made regarding Unitarian Universalists engaging in such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape are by no means unfounded, it is an accusation that would be of a perjurious nature if it was repeated under oath.

I consider your two cease and desist demand letters to constitute acts of dishonest and abusive legal intimidation and legal bullying comparable to a SLAPP lawsuit and you and your client can rest assured that I will be governing myself accordingly. If the UUA wishes to settle our long standing dispute in a manner that genuinely honors and upholds UU principles and ideals, instead of repeatedly and continuously making a total mockery of claimed UU principles, I suggest that they try a different approach.

In the meantime I will be taking steps to ensure that you, Stikeman Elliott LLP Barristers & Solicitors, and those UUA administrators and UU clergy who are responsible for hiring you to engage in your arrogant and aggressive legal intimidation face some real accountability for this quite ludicrous example of legalistic spitting into the wind.

Sincerely,

Robin Edgar