Reverend Kate Braestrup And Unitarian Universalist Child Sex Abuse Cover-Up - What's The Connection?
How about these comments that self-identified Unitarian Universalist minister Reverend Kate Braestrup deleted aka "memory holed" from the 'Am I Still A Unitarian Universalist Minister? post on her 'Truly Open Minds And Hearts' blog?
If Unitarian Universalism (UU aka U*U) truly was "a liberal religion characterized by a free and responsible search for truth and meaning", the Rev. Dr. Peter "Beyond Belief" Morales led UUA would never have instructed its Canadian attorney, Stikeman Elliott Barristers & Solicitors defamation lawyer Maitre Marc-André Coulombe, to falsely accuse Yours Truly of the archaic criminal act of "blasphemous libel" for blogging about "such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape" most certainly committed by "certain Unitarian Universalist ministers", such as Rev. Mack Wallace Mitchell to name but one of them. . .
For more information about the UUA's outrageously hypocritical abusive misuse of Canada's blasphemy law in UUA clergy sex abuse cover-up legal bullying that was*is quite evidently intended to conceal egregious child sex abuse committed by abusive UUA clergy from the public just run a free and responsible Google search for the truth and meaning of what I just said here. . .
Robin Edgar aka The Emerson Avenger
One M. Fidelman responded to my first comment thusly:
In fairness, the UUA, it’s officers, and its staff do not have the authority to define what UUism is. NOBODY does. That Rev. Morales, and the UUA, brought criminal charges against you, reflect on them, not UUdom as a whole. IMHO, there is still time to reclaim the values & traditions of UUdom as a loose collection of free churches, sharing common notions of “liberal religion” – from those who seek to usurp power and authority over UU congregations, and the body of UUdom.
To which I responded thusly:
Thanks for your response mfidelman.
In Truth. . .
The UUA, it’s officers, and its staff may not have the authority to define what UUism is but, through its words and actions, or indeed its complicit silence and negligent inaction. . . the UUA never-the-less largely defines what UUism is in the public perception. The Rev. Morales led the UUA never actually brought criminal charges against me. It threatened to do so in a ridiculous cease and desist demand letter that sought to intimidate me into deleting The Emerson Avenger blog posts that told the readily verifiable Truth about “such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape” committed by “certain Unitarian Universalist ministers”, not to mention certain UUA Religious Educators etc. I humiliated the UUA's Canadian attorney, and top-level UUA leadership, in my "less than polite" email responses to this shamefully UNethical UUA legal bullying, which not only disregarded and violated most of UUism's Seven Principles, but ignominiously terminated a centuries old tradition of opposing blasphemy laws that Unitarians*Universalists held to right up to the spring of 2012.
This UUA legal bullying does in fact reflect on UUdom as a whole, because the UUA officially represents UUism to the world, and also because not one single Unitarian*Universalist minister, or UUA leader, has ever publicly spoken out against the UUA's abusive misuse of Canada's blasphemy law in legal bullying intended to conceal child sex abuse committed by UU pedophiles and rapists. Those UUs who desire to "reclaim the values & traditions of UUdom as a loose collection of free churches, sharing common notions of “liberal religion”" would be very well-advised to go on public record as condemning this ignominious episode in Unitarian*Universalist history. As far as I am concerned, any and all UUs who do not condemn this injustice, effectively condone it. . . I am still waiting for the UUA to formally withdraw its false accusations against me, publicly apologize for them, and publicly disclose the Truth about child sex abuse committed by UUA ministers and Religious Educators.
Robin Edgar aka The Emerson Avenger
If Unitarian Universalism (UU aka U*U) truly was "a liberal religion characterized by a free and responsible search for truth and meaning", the Rev. Dr. Peter "Beyond Belief" Morales led UUA would never have instructed its Canadian attorney, Stikeman Elliott Barristers & Solicitors defamation lawyer Maitre Marc-André Coulombe, to falsely accuse Yours Truly of the archaic criminal act of "blasphemous libel" for blogging about "such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape" most certainly committed by "certain Unitarian Universalist ministers", such as Rev. Mack Wallace Mitchell to name but one of them. . .
For more information about the UUA's outrageously hypocritical abusive misuse of Canada's blasphemy law in UUA clergy sex abuse cover-up legal bullying that was*is quite evidently intended to conceal egregious child sex abuse committed by abusive UUA clergy from the public just run a free and responsible Google search for the truth and meaning of what I just said here. . .
Robin Edgar aka The Emerson Avenger
One M. Fidelman responded to my first comment thusly:
In fairness, the UUA, it’s officers, and its staff do not have the authority to define what UUism is. NOBODY does. That Rev. Morales, and the UUA, brought criminal charges against you, reflect on them, not UUdom as a whole. IMHO, there is still time to reclaim the values & traditions of UUdom as a loose collection of free churches, sharing common notions of “liberal religion” – from those who seek to usurp power and authority over UU congregations, and the body of UUdom.
To which I responded thusly:
Thanks for your response mfidelman.
In Truth. . .
The UUA, it’s officers, and its staff may not have the authority to define what UUism is but, through its words and actions, or indeed its complicit silence and negligent inaction. . . the UUA never-the-less largely defines what UUism is in the public perception. The Rev. Morales led the UUA never actually brought criminal charges against me. It threatened to do so in a ridiculous cease and desist demand letter that sought to intimidate me into deleting The Emerson Avenger blog posts that told the readily verifiable Truth about “such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape” committed by “certain Unitarian Universalist ministers”, not to mention certain UUA Religious Educators etc. I humiliated the UUA's Canadian attorney, and top-level UUA leadership, in my "less than polite" email responses to this shamefully UNethical UUA legal bullying, which not only disregarded and violated most of UUism's Seven Principles, but ignominiously terminated a centuries old tradition of opposing blasphemy laws that Unitarians*Universalists held to right up to the spring of 2012.
This UUA legal bullying does in fact reflect on UUdom as a whole, because the UUA officially represents UUism to the world, and also because not one single Unitarian*Universalist minister, or UUA leader, has ever publicly spoken out against the UUA's abusive misuse of Canada's blasphemy law in legal bullying intended to conceal child sex abuse committed by UU pedophiles and rapists. Those UUs who desire to "reclaim the values & traditions of UUdom as a loose collection of free churches, sharing common notions of “liberal religion”" would be very well-advised to go on public record as condemning this ignominious episode in Unitarian*Universalist history. As far as I am concerned, any and all UUs who do not condemn this injustice, effectively condone it. . . I am still waiting for the UUA to formally withdraw its false accusations against me, publicly apologize for them, and publicly disclose the Truth about child sex abuse committed by UUA ministers and Religious Educators.
Robin Edgar aka The Emerson Avenger
Comments