A Primer On Peacebang And Other DIM Thinking U*Us Pathologically Not Getting It. . .

Here it comes. . . here it comes. . . here comes your 19th "neurotic reaction". . .

PeaceBang said...

I'm discussing theological connections between Catholic doctrine and Catholic child molestation here. That's the topic, that's what I stayed with.
However,I think it would be interesting for someone to respond with reflections on how Universalist theological tradition could contribute to UU clergy misconduct. There is certainly a worthy column there, but I'm not choosing to write it. If you do, feel free to link it here.

The trick to not getting your comments deleted is to make them directly and specifically relevant to the subject at hand (as in a conversation, not an off-topic tirade), don't attack individuals by name, and just acccept that all comments on this blog are subject to the editorial trashcan.

4:21 PM

PeaceBang said...

whoops! make that "UNITARIAN AND UNIVERSALIST theological tradition might contribute to abusive sexual relations."(The "Unitarian" got accidentally deleted!)

4:23 PM

The Emerson Avenger said...

Well this Unitarian has repeatedly been knowingly, willfully and permanently deleted by "memory-holing" U*Us who choose to participate in U*U church censorship and U*U community denial of U*U injustices, abuses, and hypocrisy. . .

:The trick to not getting your comments deleted is to make them directly and specifically relevant to the subject at hand (as in a conversation, not an off-topic tirade),

My comment was by no means "an off-topic tirade" as you allege in an effort to rationalize and justify your knowing and willful *censorship* of my very pertinent commentary on your post. In fact, characterizing my terse and pithy commentary as a "tirade" is not only patently ridiculous but stunningly hypocritical. Your own angry and even "vitriolic" post is far more characteristic of a bona fide "tirade" than what I posted as a comment to it. . . Part and parcel of your own self-selected "subject at hand" in your own "tirade" was the issue of "community denial", thus my comment about the "community denial" of U*Us in the face of clergy mnisconduct and other injustices and abuses, including your own Denial I'm afraid. . . was in fact "directly and specifically relevant to the subject at hand" as you yourself presented that "subject at hand". N'est-ce pas Peacebang?

:don't attack individuals by name,

You and other U*U clergy directly or indirectly "attack individuals by name" on an ongoing basis. In fact U*Us, perhaps especially U*U clergy, are past masters at indirectly attacking individuals without actually coming out and "directly and specifically" naming them. Right Peacebang? You are thus exercising a stunningly hypocritical double standard by admonishing me not to "attack individuals by name". Your own "tirade" effectively attacked "the priest" by name and "the neighbor" by name in that it contained a link to the New York Times article in which they were named. Just to make my point I am going to repost the comment that you "memory holed" and describe a certain unmentionable U*U minister and a certain unmentionable MFC Director with their names replaced by their titles. The post will of course link to other material in which they are named but even the link will contain their titles rather than their names. I look forward to seeing just what lame excuses you may offer to try to justify that U*U "memory holing" *censorship and *suppression* of that comment again. . . I expect that post to remain in place Peacebang. If you censor it again you will be held accountable by the dreaded Emerson Avenger. . . ;-) :and just acccept that all comments on this blog are subject to the editorial trashcan. Sorry Peacebang but what you euphemistically refer to as "the editorial trashcan" is more appropriately referred to as the U*U "memory hole". An Orwellian "memory hole" that you and other hypocritical U*Us happily operate in order to *censor* and *suppress* my own and other people's perfectly legitimate exposure, denouncement, and criticism of internal U*U injustices and abuses including, but by no means limited, to clergy misconduct committed by U*U ministers whether it be clergy sexual misconduct or otherwise. . . So I am sorry to have to report that I will definitely not accept that comments on the blog of any U*U minister, not just yours Peacebang, are subject to censorship and suppression by U*Us who choose to participate in U*U "community denial" of U*U injustices, U*U abuses, and U*U hypocrisy etc. I will remind you and every other U*U minister that U*Us very publicly (and quite evidently quite fraudulently. . .) profess to be great defenders of civil liberties and freedom of expression etc. and to be "opposed" to censorship. In fact U*Us officially proclaim that, "We jealously guard the right to know, to speak and to argue freely, according to conscience, within our own church and in society at large. We are opposed to censorship by church, state, or any other institution. We believe that truth emerges more clearly under conditions of freedom." I am only exercising my right, and indeed my responsibility. . . to speak and to argue freely, according to *my* conscience, "within our own church" (as it were) and in society at large, but you and rather too many other outrageously hypocritical U*Us, including other hypocritical U*U clergy. . . are quite evidently going out of your way to participate in flagrant "community denial" and perfectly obvious U*U church censorship of my own and other people's legitimate criticism, dissent and outstanding grievances. As a minister in the U*U religious community I expect you to set an example and make an effort to actually live up to U*U pronouncements made in U*U propaganda that (most unfortunately quite hypocritically and even quite fraudently) proclaim that U*Us are opposed to censorship. I expect all other U*U ministers to do likewise. Those U*U ministers who have actively participated in the DIM Thinking "cover-up and denial" of U*U "community denial" of my own and other people's legitimate criticism and dissent, and persist in U*U church censorship and suppression of my "right of conscience" will be named and shamed on The Emerson Avenger blog with directly and specifically relevant examples of their censorship and "community denial" provided as evidence wherever possible. I find it quite regrettable that, along with another female U*U minister, you have made yourself a not so new poster girl for U*U community denial. . .

5:55 PM

The Emerson Avenger said...

If at first you don't succeed. . .

Try, try again.

Let's make the female former MFC Director our new poster girl for U*U community denial. And let's make the unmentionable Unitarian Church our new poster church for U*U community denial. A decade of DIM Thinking denial, ignorance and minimization of obvious clergy misconduct, and various other U*U injustices and abuses, is a pretty shameful record of community denial. . .

6:12 PM

The Emerson Avenger said...

The above post meets your own stated criteria for what is acceptable to post on your blog Peacebang. It does not (directly) "attack individuals by name". It does however do exactly what you have done in your own post about "Catholic sexual abuse" and related "community denial". . . It replaces the names of the "individuals" who I choose to allegedly "attack" with other descriptors such as their titles and provides (indirect) links to web pages where these "individuals" are in fact named. It's a pretty pathetic roundabout way of "attacking" individuals but it is exactly how you and other hypocritical U*Us, including no shortage of unmentionable U*U ministers. . . choose to do it. I am thus choosing to comply with your cynical and hypocritical conditions for "not getting your comments deleted" in order to make a point. In future I expect to be able to name individuals, including you, who I have good reason to "attack" as you put it.

6:27 PM

Quite regrettably Peacebang chose to ignore all of the foregoing and promptly U*U "memory holed" all of the above comments. I thus nominate Peacebang aka U*U minister Rev. Victoria Weinstein, currently the U*U minister of The First Parish Unitarian Church of Norwell, Massachusetts, as the current poster girl for pathologically DIM Thinking U*U "community denial".

Wow! Yet more evidence that Google really IS on my side! My link to a Google search on - Unitarian "community denial" - was intended for future use but it is already usable right now since Google has already indexed and yes, Google cached. . . The Emerson Avenger posts that U*U minister Victoria Weinstein aka Peacebang so foolishly "memory holed" in her pathological desire to become an accessory after the fact in Rev. Ray Drennan's U*U clergy misconduct and a participant in the "community denial" that the Unitarian Church of Montreal, Rev. Diane Miller and other DIM Thinking UUA administrators', including former UUA President Rev. Dr. John Beuhrens. . . initiated over a decade ago.