This Blog's For U*Us. . .

Sorry. . . I just couldn't resist that one! ;-)
Email Post

Comments

Anonymous said…
The withdrawal of Mr. Edgar’s membership from the Unitarian Church of Montreal was not motivated by his religious beliefs, but by his disruptive and aggressive behavior towards the members of this congregation. His inappropriate behaviour has continued for more than ten years. Seven years ago he was brought before a Disruptive Behavior Committee, where over the next three years attempts were made to have him moderate his unacceptable behaviours. He would agree to proposed solutions and then go on as before. He was repeatedly warned that failure to comply with what he had agreed to do would result in serious consequences. Over this period, he was suspended from participation in Church life for six months. Unfortunately, upon his return his behaviour worsened , and he was suspended for an additional year. Again when he returned, his inappropriate behavior continued. Finally in November 1999, at a meeting of the full congregation, during which he spoke on his own behalf, a congregational vote was taken and his membership was revoked. This decade long process, during which sincere attempts were made by the congregation to negotiate a solution, ended when it became that he had no intention of ceasing his disruptive and aggressive behaviours. It should be noted that Reverend Ray Drennan did apologise, in person, on more than one occasion. However, this did not meet with Mr Edgar’s satisfaction. Mr. Edgar has redressed his grievances to whomever he has saw fit, be it the UAA, CUC, etc., and his complaint to the Quebec Human Rights Commission in 2002 was summarily dismissed as being without merit. Mr Edgar continues to picket the church in the futile belief that the Church will act. Reverend Drennan is no longer the minister as he left to follow his own life’s journey; and the church has simply moved on.
Friday, January 27, 2006 3:21:00 pm
Robin Edgar said…
Yesterday anonymous U*U posted exactly the same sincerely ignorant, if not conscientiously stupid. . . example of effectively complicit, and considerably less than plausible. . . "plausible denial" of the U*U injustices, U*U abuses, and U*U hypocrisy that I have been exposing and denouncing in both the U*U World and the real world for about a decade now.

Anyone of moderate intelligence with a modicum of conscience can easily see that anonymous U*U is guilty of engaging in complicit U*U denial and institutional stonewalling etc. and is almost certainly a leader of the Unitarian Church of Montreal, a Canadian Unitarian Council aka CUC collaborator (hi Bert), or possibly even a Unitarian*Universalist U*U from the U*UofA. . . Anyone with eyes to see can simply look to their left to the sidebar links to earlier posts to see that I already posted a point by point rebuttal (aka a * by * reU*Ual) to this fine example of U*U BS and U*U institutional denial, U*U whitewashing and U*U stonewalling yesterday. . .

I can't believe that anonymous U*U could be so U*Uinine, aka conscientiously stupid. . . as to repost this U*U BS after I had already ripped his or her clearly incompetent and highly implausible attempt at U*U "plausible denial" to tiny little shreds in that earlier * by * re*butt*al.
Friday, January 27, 2006 5:16:00 pm
indrax said…
Anonymous:
I take it you are from the Unitarian Church of Montreal?
I would enjoy getting more background on this. Please email me at indraxblog@gmail.com

Robin: I wouldn't mind a private dialog with you, either.
Saturday, January 28, 2006 12:42:00 am
Post a Comment