Skip to main content

Is UUA Executive Vice President Kathleen 'Kay Montgomery Losing It?

Just asking. . .


Without Prejudice


Dear 'Kay,

Perhaps your email message below was actually intended for another recipient. 

If however you *really* would be "delighted" to clearly identify those The Emerson Avenger blog posts that the UUA is alleging to contain, "unfounded and vicious allegations to the effect that ministers of the Association engage in such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape", I would much prefer that you did so officially and in writing. Please provide the blog post titles, their respective URLs, and quote the exact allegations therein that the UUA ostensibly believes to be "unfounded and vicious" and even defamatory to the extent that they amount to the archaic if not obsolete crime act of blasphemous libel.

That being said, perhaps I will take you up on your apparent offer to have a telephone conversation with you tomorrow morning on Thor's Day aka Thursday December 13th at around 11 am.

Thank you,

Robin Edgar aka The Emerson Avenger



From: Kay Montgomery
To: Robin Edgar
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 7:13:08 PM
Subject: Re: A Few More Questions Re: Unitarian Universalist Association and al. vs. Yourself

I'd be delighted. Tomorrow at 11am?  Or, come to think of it, now and until 9pm. If the latter, call on 617/851-XXXX. Kay


Kathleen Montgomery
Executive Vice President
Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 12, 2012, at 7:04 PM, "Robin Edgar" <robinedgar59@yahoo.ca> wrote:

Wednesday aka Woden's Day December 12, 2012 

Without Prejudice

Dear 'Kay,

To paraphrase a few choice words of UUA President Rev. Peter Morales.

This is *your* mess.



It is now well over six months since I have heard from your Canadian attorney, Stikeman Elliott LLP Barristers & Solicitors litigation lawyer Maitre Marc-Andre Coulombe. He has utterly failed, indeed he has apparently outright refused, to provide the slightest scrap of evidence in support of the UUA's dubious allegation to the effect that I have made "unfounded and vicious allegations to the effect that ministers of the Association engage in such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape" and that, furthermore, such alleged "unfounded and vicious allegations" amount to the archaic criminal act of blasphemous libel. As may be seen in the emails that I have forwarded below, I have repeatedly asked your attorney Maitre Coulombe to clearly identify those The Emerson Avenger blog posts that the Unitarian Universalist Association ostensibly believes to contain "unfounded and vicious allegations to the effect that ministers of the Association engage in such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape" but he has not yet done so.

It is my understanding that in your capacity as the Executive Vice President of the Unitarian Universalist Association it is your responsibility to coordinate the work of the UUA's legal counsel, presumably that responsibility includes responsibly coordinating the work of the UUA's designated Canadian attorneys Stikeman Elliott Barristers & Solicitors, and thus by extension the work of Maitre Marc-Andre Coulombe. Since Maitre Coulombe has failed, or indeed outright refused, to clearly identify those blog posts that the UUA alleges to contain "unfounded and vicious allegations to the effect that ministers of the Association engage in such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape" I am hereby asking you to identify them yourself so that I can then responsibly determine whether or not they actually are "unfounded and vicious" as the UUA more than a little bit questionably asserted in its now six month old cease and desist demand letter. 

That is all for now,

Robin Edgar aka The Emerson Avenger

Comments