The Emerson Avenger

The Emerson Avenger is a "memory hole" free blog where censorship is scorned. This blog will "guard the right to know" about any injustices and abuses that corrupt Unitarian Universalism. Posters may speak and argue freely, according to conscience, about any injustices and abuses, or indeed hypocrisy, that they may know about so that the Avenger, in the form of justice and redress, may come surely and swiftly. . . "Slowly, slowly the Avenger comes, but comes surely." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

My Photo
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

In 1992 I underwent a profound revelatory experience of God which revealed that the total solar eclipse "Eye of God" is a "Sign in the Heavens" that symbolizes God's divine omniscience. You may read about what Rev. Ray Drennan of the Unitarian Church of Montreal contemptuously dismissed as my "psychotic experience" here: - This revelatory religious experience inspired me to propose an inter-religious celebration of Creation that would take place whenever a total solar eclipse took place over our planet. You may read about what Rev. Ray Drennan and other leading members of the Unitarian Church of Montreal falsely and maliciously labeled as a "cult" here: - I am now an excommunicated Unitarian whose "alternative spiritual practice" includes publicly exposing and denouncing Unitarian*Universalist injustices, abuses, and hypocrisy. The Emerson Avenger blog will serve that purpose for me and hopefully others will share their concerns here. Dee Miller's term DIM Thinking is used frequently and appropriately on this blog. You may read more about what DIM Thinking is here -

Saturday, April 06, 2013

Rev. Dr. Fredric Muir Has Grown Quite Tired Of The Silly Ignorance Of The Uninformed U*Us. . .

But don't take *my* word for it U*Us, take the word of Rev. Dr. Fredric J. Muir himself, as posted to his 'Building the UU Beloved Community' blog in a post entitled 'A Silly Religion?'

Without further ado, here is the comment that I have successfully posted in response to Rev. Fred Muir's 'A Silly Religion?' blog post lamenting The Silly Ignorance Of The U*Us with some hyperlinks added so that persons of inherent worth and dignity may engage in a free and *responsible* search for its Truth and meaning. . .

"I’ve grown quite tired of outsiders - and insiders, as in our own members and friends - whose misunderstanding of Unitarian Universalism leads them to conclusions and then utterances that are at best wrong and at worst offensive.  My hope and prayer is to see the day when we no longer must endure the silly ignorance of the uninformed."

As someone who is very well acquainted with UU clergy sexual misconduct, how do you feel about the following "utterances" made in an arrogant and aggressive cease and desist demand letter that the UUA hired its Canadian attorney, Stikeman Elliott Barristers & Solicitors litigation lawyer Maitre Marc-André Coulombe, have me served with last June?

"Your unfounded and vicious allegations to the effect that ministers of the Association engage in such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape are similarly defamatory to an extent such that they constitute blasphemous libel which is prohibited under section 296 of the Criminal Code (R.S.C. 1985, c. C.46.1)."

Besides being poorly written and researched and - in several places - simply wrong, I’ve been wondering what the point of the cease and desist letter was. What was the UUA's goal?  Was there purpose to the UUA's shoddy (and indeed shameful) Lance Armstrong style legal bullying?  What *was* the UUA trying to accomplish?* 

Sadly, I have been enduring this "silly ignorance of the uninformed" (to say nothing of the perjurious lies of well informed UUA leaders. . .) for over ten months now because the Peter Morales UUA administration is obstinately refusing to formally withdraw these highly questionable accusations that are at best wrong, and at worst offensive to anyone who knows anything about "less than perfect" UU clergy and UU Religious Educators etc. who have actually been convicted of such despicable crimes as pedophilia and rape. . . and properly and publicly apologize to me for bringing these unfounded and more than a little bit offensive accusations against me.

* This is a classic example of what is known as "a rhetorical question". . .

End quote

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,


Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home