The Emerson Avenger

The Emerson Avenger is a "memory hole" free blog where censorship is scorned. This blog will "guard the right to know" about any injustices and abuses that corrupt Unitarian Universalism. Posters may speak and argue freely, according to conscience, about any injustices and abuses, or indeed hypocrisy, that they may know about so that the Avenger, in the form of justice and redress, may come surely and swiftly. . . "Slowly, slowly the Avenger comes, but comes surely." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

My Photo
Name:
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

In 1992 I underwent a profound revelatory experience of God which revealed that the total solar eclipse "Eye of God" is a "Sign in the Heavens" that symbolizes God's divine omniscience. You may read about what Rev. Ray Drennan of the Unitarian Church of Montreal contemptuously dismissed as my "psychotic experience" here: http://revelationisnotsealed.homestead.com - This revelatory religious experience inspired me to propose an inter-religious celebration of Creation that would take place whenever a total solar eclipse took place over our planet. You may read about what Rev. Ray Drennan and other leading members of the Unitarian Church of Montreal falsely and maliciously labeled as a "cult" here: http://creationday.homestead.com - I am now an excommunicated Unitarian whose "alternative spiritual practice" includes publicly exposing and denouncing Unitarian*Universalist injustices, abuses, and hypocrisy. The Emerson Avenger blog will serve that purpose for me and hopefully others will share their concerns here. Dee Miller's term DIM Thinking is used frequently and appropriately on this blog. You may read more about what DIM Thinking is here - http://www.takecourage.org/defining.htm

Friday, June 26, 2009

Truth In U*U Advertising aka What The Ever So "Hard Core" Peacebang Probably Would Not Want To See In UUA Marketing Materials aka U*U Tracts. . .

In the proverbial "truth in advertising" department Rev. Victoria Weinstein aka Peacebang lets U*Us know what she wants to see in UUA marketing campaign materials in a blog post titled What I’d Prefer To See. I may deal with its rather dubious content in more depth later, but for now here is the comment that I expect that Peacebang, to say nothing of other U*Us, would prefer not to see. . .

How about an image of an inherently edgy and not "nice" U*U minister anally impaling a U.S. state senator on the Statue of Liberty's torch Peacebang?

Or maybe an image of an inherently edgy and not "nice" U*U minister kicking an alleged thief in the teeth?

Perhaps an image of an inherently edgy and not "nice" U*U minister trying to ward of some kind of Transcendentalist Super Vampire with a life-size crucifix that still is somehow unable to keep him at bay?

What does that little blurb over to the right say?

Oh ya. . .

Beauty Tips for Ministers -

"Because you’re in the public eye, and God knows you need to look good."

Such a shame that Rev. Victoria Weinstein apparently believes that this "need to look good" in the proverbial "public eye" applies only to the clothes that ministers wear and the mascara and/or other cosmetics aka "make up" they may apply to their two faces. . .

Update: Peacebang deleted aka "memory holed the above comment so I decided to repost the following "new and improved" version in honor of Mr. U*U BDSM Desmond Ravenstone, Rev. Mack Mitchell, and Rev. Victoria Weinstein's "ravishing" parishioner Richard Buell. . .

How about an image of an inherently edgy and not “nice” U*U minister anally impaling a U.S. state senator on the Statue of Liberty’s torch Peacebang?

(I bet Mr. U*U BDSM Desmond Ravenstone would find that particular image to be quite appealing, amongst others. . . Come to think of it, how about a U*U minister modeled on Rev. Mack Mitchell “ravishing” a helpless teenage Tibetan refugee tied to the bed in his U*U “parsonage”). If that’s a bit too “image tarnishing” of U*U clergy perhaps you could just show an aging U*U lay person “ravishing” a pre-teen “female family member” or a neighbor’s daughter. Or is that just a bit *too* “kinky” for “mainstream” public consumption?

The rest of the "song" remained the same. . .

Labels: , , , , , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home