TIME magazine Person Of The Year For 2011 Is None Other Than The Emerson Avenger Dreaded Scourge Of U*U Hypocrites U*U World-Wide :-)


That's right U*Us. . .

TIME magazine has just officially named The Emerson Avenger aka The Protester as its 'Person Of The Year' for 2011!





Comments

JMP said…
Well, you did make it into Wikipedia as a Street Protester.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Street_protester
Robin Edgar said…
Yes, I have been aware of that for some time now. The last time I checked, most protesters are "street protesters".
Anonymous said…
And interestingly some person of inherent worth and dignity put your name above links to "conspiracy theory" and "paranoia" on that wikipedia site.
Robin Edgar said…
There is absolutely no "conspiracy theory" or paranoia on *my* part. That kind of accusation is much more applicable to the U*U morons who slander Creation Day as a "cult"such as Rev. Ray Drennan, Frank Greene and John Inder. Then there are Rev. Diane Rollert's paranoid delusions that caused her to claim to be "very frightened of me even though I had done nothing that should cause any *reasonable* person to be "very frightened" of me. . .
Anonymous said…
well... I choose to take it as a sign from some sort of higher power that your name appears above "conspiracy theory" and "paranoia". Please respect my beliefs.
Robin Edgar said…
If you want me to respect your beliefs I would suggest that you try holding to beliefs that are actually respectable... Nobody is required to respect beliefs that are demonstrably wrong, highly questionable, or harmful and damaging etc. etc. etc.

I challenge you and other U*Us to back-up any claims that I may be paranoid with some evidence. I can certainly point out how a certain of number of Unitarian Universalists, including some "less than perfect" U*U clergy, are apparently suffering from deep personal insecurity, if not outright paranoid delusions. . . Indeed I know of a few U*U ministers who have been diagnosed with serious mental illnesses whereas I have never been diagnosed with any mental illness worse than a low end depression.

In any case, on the whole, that Wikipedia page about so-called "street protesters" is actually more flattering that quite a bit of the slander and libel and other "insulting and defamatory language" that intolerant and abusive Unitarian Universalists having been spewing at me over the last decade and a half. . .
Anonymous said…
what makes you think I am UU? Do you think one has to be brainwashed by the UU to come and criticize/poke fun at your blogs? Yes since my early twenties I have sporadically attended UU services in Montreal and other cities and am more in line with their beliefs than say, Evangelical Protestantism or any other established religion but I have no family, close friends, or childhood memories of UUism, never been a member and no plans to become one. I saw your protests while entering UCM and decided to check you out online, since I love a good underdog, David vs Goliath story and anyone who is critical of religious institutions whether they are old gigantic entities like the Catholic Church or little, "liberal minded" relative newbies like modern UUism I think I gave you the benefit of the doubt. But I see nothing but a man who can't get over the fact that he was called "psychotic" some 15 years ago by someone who is long since retired. And the fact that you would unapologetically dare to compare in any way shape or fashion your "plight" of a grown man being called names and excommunicated from a congregation with the sexual abuse of minors by clergy has pretty much erased any sympathy I will ever have for your cause. That was the ten ton stone that broke the camel's back so to speak in terms of your reasoned and respectable critique of UUism.
Robin Edgar said…
I challenge you to provide evidence of where I have "unapologetically dare(d) to compare in any way shape or fashion (my) "plight" of a grown man being called names and excommunicated from a congregation with the sexual abuse of minors by clergy."

Clergy misconduct comes in numerous forms, not all of them sexual by any means. I have always been upfront about the fact that the clergy misconduct that I am dealing with personally is not clergy sexual misconduct. That being said, I have spoken out against U*U clergy sexual misconduct which includes, but is by no means limited to, the sexual abuse of minors by a certain number of U*U clergy. The Unitarian Universalist religious community has a lamentable history of negligence towards and complicity in clergy sexual misconduct and its track record for dealing with non-sexual forms of clergy misconduct is even worse. . . My emphasis has always been on the fact that the UUA, and Unitarian Universalists more generally, do virtually nothing to deal responsibly with non-sexual forms of clergy misconduct some of which can be more harmful than the less serious forms of clergy sexual misconduct.

Thankfully I am not looking for "sympathy" from willfully ignorant AssHats, be they U*U AssHats or otherwise. . . Your misrepresentation of the facts discredits your testimony here. The fact of the matter is that I received an email on the Winter Solstice from a well-respected Unitarian Universalist minister who is *very* aware of how the UUA negligently mishandles all manner of clergy misconduct complaints, one who has previously expressed "appreciation" for my "prophetic work", which contained the following complimentary sentence -

"Your persistence is a ministry."

Whose testimony do you think carries rather more weight with me, and no doubt other people of intelligence and conscience, than your foolish words here?