Unitarian Universalist Ministers aka Big Fat U*U Clergy Are Not Well-Groomed "Less Than Fit" Overwhelmingly Sloppy And Have Horrifyingly Bad Hair Days
Butt don't take *my* word for it U*Us.
Take the ever so authoritative word of the official U*U maven of all internet social media Rev. Dr. Victoria Weinstein aka Peacebang as posted to the 'More Casual Politicians' post of her 'Beaty Tips For Ministers' blog.
"Clergy are generally not unusually gorgeous and well-groomed, nor to we tend to be fit enough to wear sleeveless sheath dresses. . .
We’re still overwhelmingly sloppy and have horrifyingly bad hair, unflattering clothes (whether formal or informal) and can’t hold a candle to Mitt (Romney) or Michele (Bachmann) in the “with-it and eminently presentable” department."
Rev. Dr. Victoria Weinstein concludes her Big Fat U*U Beauty Tip For Big Fat U*U Ministers with the following admonition -
"Polished is not synonymous with “conservative” — get that idea out of your little heads right this instant. Nor is “respectful and well-groomed” just about clergy professionalism. It is about the church’s public image."
Funny how Peacebang seems to be so fanatically concerned about how the clothes that she and other U*U wolves in shepherd's clothing wear reflect on the Big Fat U*U Public Image of The U*U Movement aka the U*U "Church" but does not seem to be the least bit concerned about how the poorly chosen words that she utters or commits to writing and publishes on the ever so interconnected and interdependent web of the internet affect the public image of Unitarian Universalism aka the "Church" Of The Tarnished Image. . .
No U*Us?
Take the ever so authoritative word of the official U*U maven of all internet social media Rev. Dr. Victoria Weinstein aka Peacebang as posted to the 'More Casual Politicians' post of her 'Beaty Tips For Ministers' blog.
"Clergy are generally not unusually gorgeous and well-groomed, nor to we tend to be fit enough to wear sleeveless sheath dresses. . .
We’re still overwhelmingly sloppy and have horrifyingly bad hair, unflattering clothes (whether formal or informal) and can’t hold a candle to Mitt (Romney) or Michele (Bachmann) in the “with-it and eminently presentable” department."
Rev. Dr. Victoria Weinstein concludes her Big Fat U*U Beauty Tip For Big Fat U*U Ministers with the following admonition -
"Polished is not synonymous with “conservative” — get that idea out of your little heads right this instant. Nor is “respectful and well-groomed” just about clergy professionalism. It is about the church’s public image."
Funny how Peacebang seems to be so fanatically concerned about how the clothes that she and other U*U wolves in shepherd's clothing wear reflect on the Big Fat U*U Public Image of The U*U Movement aka the U*U "Church" but does not seem to be the least bit concerned about how the poorly chosen words that she utters or commits to writing and publishes on the ever so interconnected and interdependent web of the internet affect the public image of Unitarian Universalism aka the "Church" Of The Tarnished Image. . .
No U*Us?
Comments
Being very much the cat lover I do hope that the proverbial cat does not contract the foot-in-mouth disease that Anonymouse is quite evidently suffering from.
It never ceases to amaze me just how Unitarian*Universalists can deny, ignore and minimize U*U injustices, abuses and hypocrisy with DIM Thinking and yes, I have very reasonable grounds to believe that this particular cowardly anonymous commenter aka Anonymouse is a Boston Unitarian Universalist albeit not *the* Boston Unitarian.
maybe they just don't want to bother responding to your flippant rant?
You are the exact same cowardly Anonymouse according to my web stats and you hail from Jamaica Plain in Boston. Chances are *very* high that you are not only a Unitarian Universalist U*U but a U*U blogger. I could even hazard a guess as to who you *might* be.
Funny that you should describe this TEA blog post as a "flippant rant" Anonymouse since, for the most part, it simply puts Rev. Dr. Victoria Weinstein aka Peacebang on my "Eat Your Words" diet. . . You have viewed this blog post several times since posting your initial comment and have refused to do what I quite reasonably suggested that you do. . . So how about getting around to responsibly identifying the U*U injustices, abuses, and hypocrisy (to say nothing of stupidity) that this blog post deals with and then signing your real name to it. . .
Considering that you're a regular visitor here, if not an *obsessed* TEA blog reader, you should be very well acquainted with the (ahem) "back story" of Peacebang's Big Fat U*U Sodomy Fantasy and the UUA's negligent, and effectively complicit, dismissal of my formal unbecoming conduct complaint against Rev. Weinstein. . . If you have visited this blog the better part of 300 times and *really* don't know what this blog post has to do with U*U injustices, abuses and hypocrisy you are not only guilty of DIM Thinking but incredibly stupid dim thinking Anonymouse. . .
boy, you are just consumed with rage!!
chill out bro, let it go
bye bye
Jamaica Plain is not the only location that you have visited from Anonymouse, in fact most of your previous 296 visits came from Goffstown in New Hampshire. . . You may well be using a cyber café at the moment but you are almost certainly the same person who posted all three anonymous comments to this blog post. I could say more about who you quite probably are but will keep that to myself for now. . . And there is nothing I have said here that justifies you accusation that I am "consumed with rage!!" I have simply made a quite rational assessment of your incredibly foolish words posted here Anonymouse. . .