The U*U Jihad Navy Acquires The USS Manhattan Because Everybody Knows That Rev. Dr. Forrest Church Of All U*U Souls Church In New York Is. . .

*The* "very prominent minister of a New York City U*U church"*, who is numbered amongst those allegedly sleezy aka creepy "Baby-Boomer" U*U ministers who Peacebang aka Rev. Victoria Weinstein, Rev. Scott Wells, Jeff Wilson and various other slightly "less than silent" Unitarian*Universalist U*Us insinuate or allege commit adultery, "serial adultery" or otherwise, and still get "the plummiest pulpits" in the whole wide U*U World.

Of course all is forgiven if the allegedly sleezy aka creepy U*U minister marries his or her male or female fling, no matter how those U*Us met. That’s what The Emerson Avenger's been told, anyway. And I mean verbatim.

In fact Jeff Wilson apparently believes that *all* U*U ministers know exactly which "Babe Boomer" U*U minister he means when he says,

"In my mind, divorcing your wife and marrying the parishioner does NOT make everything OK."

And I mean *that* verbatim too of course.

So. . .

The U*U Jihad Navy is thus mightily pleased to very publicly announce that the latest addition to its universally expanding fleet of Star Trekking space ships is the U*UJNS Manhattan, named after *the* New York city in which *the* All U*U Souls Church that Jeff Wilson is talking about is located, as well as a quite regrettably scrapped Civil War "museum piece" the 2100-ton Canonicus class *monitor*, USS Manhattan, that was built at Jersey City, New Jersey rather than somewhere in oU*Uter space. The Emerson Avengah aka moonlighting U*U Jihad Naval Chaplain Rev. Dr. Eric Cartman III, and the Grand Admiral of the U*U Jihad Navy Rev. David O. Rankin, look forward to naming other U*U Jihad Navy ships, be they Star Trekking space ships, or top secret Stealth U*U Boats, after the cities and/or towns of alleged or actual sleezy aka creepy U*U ministers.

However. . . in completely U*Unilateral and quite voluntary, *but* considerably "less than respectful", compliance with snotty U*U Rev. Scott Wells' UUMA Guidelines** compliant policy of not allowing the name of any "state too small to hide an identity" to be viewed on his "less than brand-spanking new" and highly misleadingly, if not outright fraudU*Ulently, titled 'UU clergy sexual misconduct roll call' post, and no doU*Ubt anywhere else on his U*U 'Boy In The Bands' blog, the U*U Jihad Navy will however henceforth name the rest of its gigantic aka hU*Uge and awesomely powerful Iowa Class battleships after states that are too big aka hU*UmungoU*Us to "hide an identity" aka "cover up" the "indiscretions" of a sleezy aka creepy U*U minister. After all it was a far from "green" U*U waste of military grade white paint to write 'Name Of State Withheld In Order To Protect The Identities Of Allegedly Sleezy (Sic) Baby Boomer U*U Ministers Accused Of Clergy Sexual Misconduct' all along the Battleship Grey painted sides of the former USS Iowa after she was acquired by the U*U Jihad Navy. So I guess that would mean that the U*U Jihad Navy can *safely* rename three of its other Iowa Class battleships - U*UJNS Massachusetts, U*UJNS New York, and U*UJNS California.

* a UU church that Jeff Wilson did not join because of its tolerance of Rev. Dr. Forrest Church's "indiscretions" (admittedly, there were class reasons also why Jeff Wilson didn’t join that church but went to another Manhattan U*U church instead).

** aka Omerta-like code of silence. . .

Comments

Hi Robin:

How big a problem is sexual misconduct among UU clergy? Is this a big enough problem to be on your platform for reform if elected UUA President?

Curious about the numbers,

David Markham
Robin Edgar said…
I responded in detail, to say nothing of my habitual long-winded virtual electronic warfare l-e-n-g-th, to your previous query here David. It partially answers those questions. You're invited to have a pique for yourself. ;-)

:How big a problem is sexual misconduct among UU clergy?

I don't really know David. I guess it's as big a 'Problem' as DIM Thinking see no evil hear, no evil, U*Us want it to be. . . which seems to be not very much.

:Is this a big enough problem to be on your platform for reform if elected UUA President?

Yes. In fact it is already on the UUA's platform aka Potemkin Village of half-hearted, to say nothing of half-assed. . . reform. My approach however would be to ensure that the whole system of dealing with *all* forms of clergy misconduct was reformed. I have reasonable grounds to believe that the U*Us running the UUA place such a strong emphasis on clergy sexual misconduct in order to Deny, Ignore or Minimize any all forms of non-sexual clergy misconduct, some of which are every bit as harmful and damaging (if not more so) to victims and implicated/affected U*U congregations than some of the lesser forms of clergy sexual misconduct.

Real reform, to say nothing of real *enforcement*, of the UUA's existing policies and procedures for dealing with clergy misconduct is definitely needed. Valid and valuable recommendations for improvements to these policies and procedures have been ignored and/or dismissed or simply not implemented and enforced on UUA President Bill Sinkford's "watch" aka "oversight". . .