Philocrites Tells A Narcissistic "Troll" To Caesar and Diseased! (Oops Was That A Freudian Slip?)

CC: HackTheDagger@hotmail.com
From: "Chris Walton" <cwalton@philocrites.com> Add to Address Book
Subject: Re: [Philocrites] ''Uncommon Denomination' in the news.'
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:09:36 -0500
To: "Robin Edgar" <robinedgar59@yahoo.ca>

Clever, Robin, but you're still trolling. The reason you're banned is that you only post about your own crusade. Stop it. (Editor's note - I would say that Google is definitely on my side there. . .)

Chris
www.philocrites.com (Editor's note - Google strikes again!)


On Dec 10, 2005, at 4:25 PM, HackTheDagger@hotmail.com wrote:

> I wonder if the brainiac who came up with the 'Uncommon Denomination' marketing slogan
was somehow inspired by my "'UNSAFE SECT'? picket sign slogan? ;-)
>
> Plagiarize Plagiarize
> Let no one else's work evade your eyes
> Remember why the good Lord made your eyes
> So don't shade your eyes
> But plagiarize, plagiarize, plagiarize
> Only be sure always to call it please research
>
> Oops I almost forgot to credit Tom Lehrer
>
> http://www.com-www.com/musiclyrics/lehrertom-lobachevsky.html

Comments

Jamie Goodwin said…
I am curious. I am not so much interested in the story of your being rejected by the Unitarian Churches in Montreal.

Why do not spend your considerable time and energies on something mroe contructive? Something like, perhaps, spreading the good news of your revalation of God outside of the UU sector?

You see to me, what it seems, is that your entire revalation was just a story made up in order to test and take exception to the UU establishment.

My feeling is that if you had a true revelation, you would be less concerned with who rejected you and more concerned with who can accept.

Personally i think your revelation (if true) is kind of beautiful, but as i did not personally experience it I cannot speak on its validity
Robin Edgar said…
Jamie Goodwin said... I am curious. I am not so much interested in the story of your being rejected by the Unitarian Churches in Montreal.

Why not?

:Why do not spend your considerable time and energies on something mroe contructive?

As far as I am concerned what I am doing is constructive. . .

:Something like, perhaps, spreading the good news of your revalation of God outside of the UU sector?

Been there done that. And in my own special way I am still doing that. . .

:You see to me, what it seems, is that your entire revalation was just a story made up in order to test and take exception to the UU establishment.

And people think that I am delusional. . .

My revelatory religious experience occurred almost two years before I first joined the Unitarian Church of Montreal. I had a good relationship with Christian Unitarian minister Rev. David B. Parke during his term as interim minister of the Unitarian Church of Montreal. There were fundie atheists who kept trying to pull the rug out from under me but Rev. Parke was able to keep them in check by appealing to UU principles. It was only after he was replaced by Rev. Ray Drennan that the really serious troubles began. Almost immediately I might add. Just enter into a genuinely *responsible* search for the truth and meaning of this "story" in Google. . .

I dare say that it is the UU establishment that "tested" and took exception to me. . . It is unfortunate that no matter how you slice it the UU establishment has in fact miserably failed a test of their readiness, willingness and even ability to walk what they so insincerely and outright fraudulently talk.

:My feeling is that if you had a true revelation, you would be less concerned with who rejected you and more concerned with who can accept.

I am very concerned with who can accept and that is precisely why UUism was "my chosen faith" if UUs actually practiced their purported Seven Principles rather than willfully disregarding them and outright flaunting them me and my revelation of God would find plenty of acceptance within the UU religious community.

:Personally i think your revelation (if true) is kind of beautiful, but as i did not personally experience it I cannot speak on its validity

It is true. It is beautiful. It is has far reaching theological implications not all of which are very pleasant. One of the reasons that I chose UUism is that it explicity claims to believe that -

The validation of experience requires the confirmation of peers, who provide a critical platform along with a network of mutual support.

Yet when I politely requested that the UU religious community apply that principle to my claimed revelation of God they not only flatly and repeatedly refused to do so but allowed Rev. Ray Drennan and his fellow iconoclasts to abusively belittle and malign me and my revelation. I am still waiting for UUs to responsibly redress the injustices, abuses, and outrageous hypocrisy that I have been subjected to by Uus and redress my grievances with genuine justice, genuine equity and genuine compassion.

Sincerely,

Robin Edgar
Robin Edgar said…
"Robin's conscience" asked - Is spiritual healing possible for Robin Edgar?

See above you pathetically pathologizing troll. . .