Rev. CrankyAss Can't Get No Satisfaction For The Unbecoming Girly Action Of Rev. Victoria Weinstein aka Peacebang
Hi Everyone!
This is Rev. CrankyAss aka Rev. Daniel Harper aka Rev. Dan Harper aka Yet Another Unitarian*Universalist Hypocrite chowing down on The Emerson Avenger's U*U World-famous "Eat Your Words Diet". The Emerson Avengah aka *The* Rev. Dr. Eric Theodore Cartman III has kindly invited me to do a testimonial for "The Eat Your Words Diet" on his blog. I am so honored to deliver this important message!
Rev. Victoria Weinstein aka Peacebang, the perpetrator of what has to be the biggest sodomy fantasy in the whole wide U*U World, is planning to plead not guilty tomorrow to all criminal charges that have been brought against her. Well, I’m no legal expert, so I have no idea what should be done to her from a legal standpoint. But I do feel competent to address some moral points that relate to Rev. Victoria Weinstein’s not guilty plea.
First, the scope of Peacebang’s crime is so vast, with so many victims, extending over such a long time that I am not convinced that Vicki She Wolf of the U*Us can be morally rehabilitated. Much of morality is a matter of habit, and the longer someone like Peacebang indulges in the habit of immorality, the longer it will take to break that habit. Then too, perniciously evil habits like Peacebang’s Beauty Tips For Ministers, which are grounded in simple vanity (if not desperation), and which are made in full knowledge that they are wrong, are habits that will be much harder to break. Because Rev. Victoria Weinstein has become habituated to crime and habituated to enjoying the fruits of her crime, because she has engaged in her crimes for so long now,
I doubt she can ever be trusted to live a moral life on her own.
Second, because Peacebang can never be trusted to live on her own again, outside of her parsonage, then she will be unable to make restitution to anyone whose teeth she kicked in. Peacebang’s crime is one where restorative justice would make a difference in the lives of the victims (at least, in the lives of the majority of her victims who did not get anally impaled on the Statue of Liberty's Torch). *Butt* we can’t ever trust her with any blogging ever again — at least, we can’t trust her to remove the Statue of Liberty's torch from her victim's backside.
The most we could hope for is an apology, but the chances of Peacebang making any meaningful apology approach zero aka love. Some people will take comfort in believing that Peacebang will suffer some kind of torment and torture after death, but even if I believed in such punishment after death, I would not call that a satisfactory resolution to Rev. Victoria Weinstein’s moral violations. Thus, I hold no hope for rehabilitation, restitution, apology, or punishment after death.
Unfortunately, this is one of those moral situations for which there is no satisfactory resolution. More unfortunately, *The* Tiny Declining Fringe Religion aka The U*U Movement does not provide nice neat satisfactory resolution of *any* moral violation. From my religious frame of reference the best moral response to Rev. Weinstein’s evil actions is — not to dwell on rehabilitation, restitution, apology, or punishment — but to strengthen the social moral systems that help prevent such actions: — speak out against unbecoming conduct; refuse to let anyone believe that we deserve to be anally impaled on the Statue of Liberty's Torch; tell your children why Peacebang is evil.
Ta from TEA Rev. CrankyAss!
This is Rev. CrankyAss aka Rev. Daniel Harper aka Rev. Dan Harper aka Yet Another Unitarian*Universalist Hypocrite chowing down on The Emerson Avenger's U*U World-famous "Eat Your Words Diet". The Emerson Avengah aka *The* Rev. Dr. Eric Theodore Cartman III has kindly invited me to do a testimonial for "The Eat Your Words Diet" on his blog. I am so honored to deliver this important message!
Rev. Victoria Weinstein aka Peacebang, the perpetrator of what has to be the biggest sodomy fantasy in the whole wide U*U World, is planning to plead not guilty tomorrow to all criminal charges that have been brought against her. Well, I’m no legal expert, so I have no idea what should be done to her from a legal standpoint. But I do feel competent to address some moral points that relate to Rev. Victoria Weinstein’s not guilty plea.
First, the scope of Peacebang’s crime is so vast, with so many victims, extending over such a long time that I am not convinced that Vicki She Wolf of the U*Us can be morally rehabilitated. Much of morality is a matter of habit, and the longer someone like Peacebang indulges in the habit of immorality, the longer it will take to break that habit. Then too, perniciously evil habits like Peacebang’s Beauty Tips For Ministers, which are grounded in simple vanity (if not desperation), and which are made in full knowledge that they are wrong, are habits that will be much harder to break. Because Rev. Victoria Weinstein has become habituated to crime and habituated to enjoying the fruits of her crime, because she has engaged in her crimes for so long now,
I doubt she can ever be trusted to live a moral life on her own.
Second, because Peacebang can never be trusted to live on her own again, outside of her parsonage, then she will be unable to make restitution to anyone whose teeth she kicked in. Peacebang’s crime is one where restorative justice would make a difference in the lives of the victims (at least, in the lives of the majority of her victims who did not get anally impaled on the Statue of Liberty's Torch). *Butt* we can’t ever trust her with any blogging ever again — at least, we can’t trust her to remove the Statue of Liberty's torch from her victim's backside.
The most we could hope for is an apology, but the chances of Peacebang making any meaningful apology approach zero aka love. Some people will take comfort in believing that Peacebang will suffer some kind of torment and torture after death, but even if I believed in such punishment after death, I would not call that a satisfactory resolution to Rev. Victoria Weinstein’s moral violations. Thus, I hold no hope for rehabilitation, restitution, apology, or punishment after death.
Unfortunately, this is one of those moral situations for which there is no satisfactory resolution. More unfortunately, *The* Tiny Declining Fringe Religion aka The U*U Movement does not provide nice neat satisfactory resolution of *any* moral violation. From my religious frame of reference the best moral response to Rev. Weinstein’s evil actions is — not to dwell on rehabilitation, restitution, apology, or punishment — but to strengthen the social moral systems that help prevent such actions: — speak out against unbecoming conduct; refuse to let anyone believe that we deserve to be anally impaled on the Statue of Liberty's Torch; tell your children why Peacebang is evil.
Comments